According to an anonymous source working at the Geotechnical & Structures Lab of the US Army Corps of Engineers in Vicksburg, Miss., a committee of government employees and contractors at Vicksburg is considering a new IT policy which will force everyone to move to Windows XP if they are not already running it, and to port all applications save one currently running on Linux to Windows. The lone exception would be moved to Solaris.
The source, a professional employed at the lab, says, "I have been told that Linux will not be allowed on our installation, which is kind of funny since our supercomputer runs SUSE Linux. There are several different computer configurations that are being discussed for specific types of work after the change. All are WinXP with one having Solaris.
"Many of us that are able to retire or find something better to do with our time are going to be leaving. Too bad since most of the people that accomplish things (e.g. scientists and engineers) will be the ones to go, I expect."
Government Computer News reported in July 2006 on the $400+ million dollar deal under which Lockheed Martin and the Corps of Engineers would share IT management of the Corps of Engineers. GCN quoted Lockheed officials at the time as saying, "The team will serve the corps' civil works, military construction, and R&D missions at more than 50 locations, providing management of infrastructure systems, records and documents; communications; desktop support; service desk; strategic planning; testing and solutions; information security; visual information; and printing and publications."
Joe Wagovich, the director of communications for Lockheed Martin Enterprise Solutions and Services, told us flatly, "Lockheed Martin has given no guidance to our Corps customer restricting the use of Linux, and we are unaware of any restrictions that the Corps made." The US Army Corps of Engineers Public Relations office in Washington, DC, has not responded to our query about the issue.
Note: Comments are owned by the poster. We are not responsible for their content.
Nothing goes onto a machie without their approval. Linux boxes are special circumstances and they definitely don't go onto a desktop machine. Here's just one website that I picked out. If you need the to do on your machine that doesn't meet the approval list, don't expect it to run on one that is connected to the network. It has to be a separate box.
As far as the security comment that I made mention of earlier. I meant to imply the reason why they're having so many problems with breaks within the gov't is because of their homogenity of the OS. I have no information as to breakins other than what has been reported in the news.
http://www.nmci-eds.com/supplier/cert.asp
Here's a quote:
Regardless of type, all software within NMCI must be certified. Software certification refers to the process by which applications/systems are determined or made to be compatible with the NMCI network and its information assurance infrastructure. NMCI certification is a matter of functional interoperability, within NMCI information assurance constraints, of the application on an NMCI desktop. Interoperability is based on the NMCI Rule Set. The NMCI Rule Set tests for the following criteria:
Windows 2000 (W2K) or XP compatible
The Soviet government put political officers onboard their bombers when it became apparent that Soviet bomber crews were waving to the US and UK pilots that intercepted them. Their job was to ensure that no member of the crew responded in a 'nice' way to western pilots.
So the US and UK pilots decided to make them work for their money. They would approach the bomber from the back, wave to the rear gunner, and watch until the political officer appeared in a window at the back. Then they would accellerate to the front of the bomber, wave at the pilots and wait, then drop back and wave again at the rear gunner. Wash, rinse and repeat.
I guess these political officers later went on to compete at the Olympics as Soviet 100 meter sprinters.
Linux to get the boot at US Army Corps of Engineers?
Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 63.161.203.11] on September 14, 2007 03:34 PM#